Pneumatic Retinopexy in Patients with Traditional and Nontraditional Selection Criteria
Keywords:
pneumatic retinopexy, selection criteria, effectivenessAbstract
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of pneumatic retinopexy in patients with traditional and nontraditional selection criteria.
Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out with patients operated on for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at the Villa Clara Ophthalmologic Center between 2020 and 2024.
Results: The primary anatomical success and functional outcome rates were 77.1 % and 92.6 % in patients with traditional criteria and 88.2 % and 93.3 % in patients with non-traditional criteria, without significant differences between both groups (p = 0.35; p = 0.74, respectively). Best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) at six months was 0.36 ± 0.22 (20/55 Snellen equivalent) and 0.34 ± 0.23 (20/58 Snellen equivalent) respectively, with significant improvement (p < 0.05) in both groups, with no difference between them (p = 0.76). The average gain was 0.43 ± 0.17 (20/46 Snellen equivalent) and 0.42 ± 0.2 (20/47 Snellen equivalent) with no significant differences (p = 0.89). The rates of complications, residual subretinal fluid and reinterventions were favorable in both groups, for 22.9 %; 33.3 %; 3.7 %, and 29.4 %; 6.7 % and 13.3 %, respectively (p = 0.78; p < 0.005; p = 0.28). The mean age of patients with residual subretinal fluid according to the overall analysis was 64.6 years, resorbing on average at 54.9 days without the need for treatment.
Conclusions: Pneumatic retinopexy is effective and a good option for treating uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. A reasonable and objective extension of the selection criteria increases eligibility, allows treatment to a larger number of patients, with good anatomical and functional results.
Downloads
References
1. Shah S, Cho B, Patel M, Watane A, Shah L, Yannuzzi N, et al. Review and analysis of history and utilization of pneumatic retinopexy after pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT). Curr Opin Ophthalmo. 2024;35(3):217-22. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001093
2. Fernández-Vega González A, Muni RH. The history of pneumatic retinopexy: have we come full circle? Acta Ophthalmol. 2022; 100:118-120. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14876
3. Brinton DA, Jun JJ. Pneumatic Retinopexy. In Ryan’s Retina. 7th ed. Elsevier Editions; 2022. p. 2076-91.
4. Huang CY, Mikowski M, Wu L. Pneumatic retinopexy: an update. Graefes Arch ClinExp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(3):711-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05448-x
5. Roshanshad A, Shirzadi S, Binder S, Arevalo JF. Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for the Management of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12:705–719. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00653-9
6. Muni RH, Felfeli T, Sadda SR, Juncal VR, Francisconi CLM, Nittala MG, et al. Postoperative Photoreceptor Integrity Following Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair: A Post Hoc Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis From the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 [acceso 21/12/2024];139(6):620-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209566/?report=reade
7. Muni RH, Francisconi CLM, Felfeli T, Mak MYK, Berger AR, Wong DT, et al. Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 [acceso: 21/12/2024];138(8):826-33. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303897/
8. Ong SS, Ahmed I, Gonzales A, Aguwa UT, Beatson B, Dai X, et al. Management of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: a comparison of practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a real-world setting. Eye. 2023; 37:684-91. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02028-z
9. Carpineto P, Licata AM, Ciancaglini M. Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Reappraisal. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:5287. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165287
10. Davidović S, Babović S, Miljković A, Pavin S, Bolesnikov-Tošić A, Barišić S. Updates on Treatment Modalities for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14) :1493. DOI: 10.3390/ diagnostics14141493
11. Castanos MV, Vail D, Otero-Marquez O, Shah Y, Deobhakta A. Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies. Int J Ophthalmol 2024;17(3):564-9. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.20
12. Teh BL, Toh S, Williamson TH, Obara B, Guillemaut JY, Steel DH. Expansile gas kinetics for pneumatic retinopexy. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/ICB.0000000000001447
13. Pecaku A, El-Sechemy A, Melo IM, Demian SE, Andreoli MT, Ramachandran A, et al. The Mini-Steamroll. An Abbreviated Variation of the Steamroller Maneuver After Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous retinal Detachment. Retina. 2024;44(11):1876-33. DOI: 10.1079/IAE.0000000000004221
14. Chrapek O, Matušková V, Vysloužilova D, Beránek J, Souček J, Sičová, et al. Pars Plana Vitrectomy in the Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Čes Slov Oftalmol. 2024;80(1):12–7. DOI: 10.31348/2424/4
15. Ling J, Noori J, Safi F, Eller AW. Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Pseudophakia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018 [acceso 21/12/2024];33(2):198-201. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08820538.2016.1190849?journalCode=isio20
16. Quezada Osoria ML, Chirinos Saldaña P, Adrianzén R. Factores relacionados al éxito anatómico y funcional de la cirugía por desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno. Instituto Regional de Oftalmología “Javier Servat Univazo” (2010 – 2019), Trujillo, Perú. Acta Med Peru. 2023;40(3):205-13. DOI: 10.35663/ amp.2023.403.2651
17. Anguita R, Lin Ting MY, Makuloluwa A, Charteris DG. Causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment. Eye. 2023; 37:185-6. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02109-z
18. Warren A, Wang DW, Lim JI. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;51(3):271-9. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14205
19. Owais Arshad M, Javed KMAA, Javed A, Chatni MH, Vayani U. Pneumatic Retinopexy: An Experience of 12 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46180. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46180
20. Ipekli Z, Pehlivanoglu, Artunay O. Efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy in Young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2023;15:1-11 DOI: 10.1177/25158414231208279
21. Chizzolini M, Martini F, Melis R, Montericcio A, Raimondi R, Allegrini D, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023;33(1):498-505. DOI: 10.1177/11206721221095041
22. Yannuzzi NA, Li C, Fujino D, Kelly SP, Lum F, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated with Pneumatic Retinopexy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 [acceso 21/12/2024];139(8):848–53. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374615/
23. Aykut A, Sevik MO, Kubat B, Dericioglu V, Sahin Ö. A Useful Method for the Practice of Pneumatic Retinopexy: Slit-Lamp Laser Photocoagulation through the Gas Bubble. J. Pers. Med. 2023; 13(5): 741.DOI:10.3390/ jpm13050741
24. Bamahfouz AY, Jouhargy S, Almalki M, Alamri O, Alsulami R, Alzahrani S. Efficacy of Pneumatic Retinopexy in Treating Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment at King Abdullah Medical City in Makkah, Saudi Arabia - A retrospective cohort study. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2021;13(24):51-61. DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v13i2.30707
25. Iannetta D, Valsecchi B, Finzi A, Matropasqua R, Muni RH, Fontana L. Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience BMC Ophthalmology. 2024; 24:287. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03559-7
26. Zhu T, Xiang Z, Huang Q, Li G, Guo S, Li E. Pneumatic Retinopexy Involving the Use of Intravitreal Air Injection and Laser Photocoagulation for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Phakic Eyes. J PersMed. 2023 [acceso 10/08/2024];13(2):328. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962162/
27. Jung JJ, Cheng J, Pan JY, Brinton DA, Hoang QV. Anatomic, Visual, and Financial Outcomes for Traditional and Nontraditional Primary Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 [acceso 21/12/2024];200:187-200. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445687/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
El contenido de la revista se encuentra accesible sin costo alguno. Está protegido por los términos de la Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional